[Icfp04-discuss] why we, the organizers, did not provide a simulator

[Laurent Desnogues]

Jed Davis wrote:

> Michael Levin <milevin at saul.cis.upenn.edu> writes:
> 
> 
>>*) A source implementation would favor a particular source
>>   language -- not good;
> 
> 
> Of course, people writing in some flavor of ML could use much of the
> pseudocode from the problem description, given some fairly minor edits
> (switch -> match, etc.).  Hmm... camlp4, anyone?

I copy/pasted most of the code from the document and
did not have to edit it that much, though the simulator
is in C.  So I am not sure the description favored ML
that much :-)


		Laurent