[POPLmark] Adequacy for LF
Carsten Schuermann
carsten at cs.yale.edu
Mon May 2 23:34:02 EDT 2005
> This again brings us back to the fundamental point that it is
> entirely spurious and counterproductive to insist on some a priori
> formulation of a language if your goal is to mechanize its
> metatheory. You have to listen to the logical framework, as it
> were, and take its advice in guiding you towards a better way to
> formulate your system. We learned this lesson many years ago when
> we first invented LF --- the exercise of formalizing a logic in LF
> does wonders for the logic.
I couldn't agree more. Countless times did LF help me improve
language and logic designs. It is a mistake to stay too attached to
at a particular formulation. Let LF be your guide. Thanks for the
comment Bob.
-- Carsten
More information about the Poplmark
mailing list