From alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org Thu Mar 1 09:12:28 2012 From: alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org (Alan Schmitt) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:12:28 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Building on Lion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 27 janv. 2012, at 09:26, Alan Schmitt wrote: > This means we need to get rid of this dependency. Should this happen in the uimacnew09 folder, or should I create a new folder? (The result of removing this dependency will be that some gradients will disappear, so Unison will be less pretty.) Alan From bcpierce at cis.upenn.edu Thu Mar 1 14:56:45 2012 From: bcpierce at cis.upenn.edu (Benjamin Pierce) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Building on Lion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2321DC69-9D7A-43F4-BAFD-EB1E71BD66DC@cis.upenn.edu> uimac12? - Benjamin On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Alan Schmitt wrote: > On 27 janv. 2012, at 09:26, Alan Schmitt wrote: > >> This means we need to get rid of this dependency. > > Should this happen in the uimacnew09 folder, or should I create a new folder? (The result of removing this dependency will be that some gradients will disappear, so Unison will be less pretty.) > > Alan > _______________________________________________ > Unison-hackers mailing list > Unison-hackers at lists.seas.upenn.edu > http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers From steve at kalkwarf.com Thu Mar 1 15:08:24 2012 From: steve at kalkwarf.com (Steve Kalkwarf) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Building on Lion In-Reply-To: <2321DC69-9D7A-43F4-BAFD-EB1E71BD66DC@cis.upenn.edu> References: <2321DC69-9D7A-43F4-BAFD-EB1E71BD66DC@cis.upenn.edu> Message-ID: <9DA57C19-B11E-4AE0-993F-FB39079929A0@kalkwarf.com> On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Benjamin Pierce wrote: > uimac12? Can I suggest that we just have one canonical uimac folder? Every time I poke at the project, it seems that the "right" Mac target has changed. What is the upside to keeping all the old Mac GUIs around? I don't see any signs that the not-most-current one is getting built by anyone. Or is there a secret mailing list I'm not subscribed to? :-) Steve -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4356 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bcpierce at cis.upenn.edu Thu Mar 1 15:53:33 2012 From: bcpierce at cis.upenn.edu (Pierce Benjamin C.) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Building on Lion In-Reply-To: <9DA57C19-B11E-4AE0-993F-FB39079929A0@kalkwarf.com> References: <2321DC69-9D7A-43F4-BAFD-EB1E71BD66DC@cis.upenn.edu> <9DA57C19-B11E-4AE0-993F-FB39079929A0@kalkwarf.com> Message-ID: Fair enough. We've gotten into the habit of proliferating new ones because they have tended to be contributed by relatively new community members and to make significant changes (so it has seemed wise not to commit to them immediately). This is a smaller change by a core contributor, so I agree we can just do it in place (and, indeed, rename it uimac). - B On Mar 1, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote: > On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Benjamin Pierce wrote: > >> uimac12? > > > Can I suggest that we just have one canonical uimac folder? Every time I poke at the project, it seems that the "right" Mac target has changed. > > What is the upside to keeping all the old Mac GUIs around? I don't see any signs that the not-most-current one is getting built by anyone. Or is there a secret mailing list I'm not subscribed to? :-) > > Steve_______________________________________________ > Unison-hackers mailing list > Unison-hackers at lists.seas.upenn.edu > http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers From steve at kalkwarf.com Thu Mar 1 15:55:50 2012 From: steve at kalkwarf.com (Steve Kalkwarf) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Building on Lion In-Reply-To: References: <2321DC69-9D7A-43F4-BAFD-EB1E71BD66DC@cis.upenn.edu> <9DA57C19-B11E-4AE0-993F-FB39079929A0@kalkwarf.com> Message-ID: <3AFE0CDF-2D2C-48CD-9707-FF9ABCDF0180@kalkwarf.com> > Fair enough. We've gotten into the habit of proliferating new ones because they have tended to be contributed by relatively new community members and to make significant changes (so it has seemed wise not to commit to them immediately). This is a smaller change by a core contributor, so I agree we can just do it in place (and, indeed, rename it uimac). Excellent. Alan, if you need a hand, you know where to find me... Steve -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4356 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org Fri Mar 2 04:58:03 2012 From: alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org (Alan Schmitt) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:58:03 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Building on Lion In-Reply-To: <3AFE0CDF-2D2C-48CD-9707-FF9ABCDF0180@kalkwarf.com> References: <2321DC69-9D7A-43F4-BAFD-EB1E71BD66DC@cis.upenn.edu> <9DA57C19-B11E-4AE0-993F-FB39079929A0@kalkwarf.com> <3AFE0CDF-2D2C-48CD-9707-FF9ABCDF0180@kalkwarf.com> Message-ID: <73FF5923-657B-4FE0-B59A-F0D40370D0CD@polytechnique.org> On 1 mars 2012, at 21:55, Steve Kalkwarf wrote: >> Fair enough. We've gotten into the habit of proliferating new ones because they have tended to be contributed by relatively new community members and to make significant changes (so it has seemed wise not to commit to them immediately). This is a smaller change by a core contributor, so I agree we can just do it in place (and, indeed, rename it uimac). > > Excellent. > > Alan, if you need a hand, you know where to find me? Well, if you want to give a hand, it would be great. The goal is to remove the following: > I used BWToolkit for the following controls: > - the background gradient in the "connecting" window > - the background gradient and inset text for the "detail" view of the main window > (the one that displays the date/time info of two differing files) > - the toolbar in the preferences window > - the split view for the main window To this end one needs to have Xcode 3 (I've installed it on my machine), open the xib file with Interface Builder, and replace the controls with standard ones. Alan From alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org Sun Mar 4 10:03:49 2012 From: alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org (Alan Schmitt) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:49 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository Message-ID: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> Hello, I'm about to create a git mirror of the Unison SVN repository, and I would like to have the developers opinion about using git instead of subversion. I've talked with Benjamin about this, and the idea is to initially keep SVN as the main repository to make sure everything is working fine, using git-svn to keep things in sync. Please let me know if you're strongly for or against this, and if you have any suggestion about it. Thanks, Alan From pascal.bach at gmx.ch Sun Mar 4 15:21:43 2012 From: pascal.bach at gmx.ch (Pascal Bach) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:21:43 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository In-Reply-To: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> References: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> Message-ID: Hi Alan, I already have a git repository up on github. (https://github.com/pascal-bach/Unison) I mainly use it to create ubuntu packages for my PPA. I occasionally sync it with the main SVN repository. But I would also be in favor of git as revision control especially in combination with Github. So +1 from my side for your idea. Pascal On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Hello, > > I'm about to create a git mirror of the Unison SVN repository, and I would like to have the developers opinion about using git instead of subversion. I've talked with Benjamin about this, and the idea is to initially keep SVN as the main repository to make sure everything is working fine, using git-svn to keep things in sync. > > Please let me know if you're strongly for or against this, and if you have any suggestion about it. > > Thanks, > > Alan > _______________________________________________ > Unison-hackers mailing list > Unison-hackers at lists.seas.upenn.edu > http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers From tomas at mudrunka.cz Mon Mar 5 07:16:58 2012 From: tomas at mudrunka.cz (=?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_Mudru=C5=88ka?=) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:16:58 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository In-Reply-To: References: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> Message-ID: <1cb0dada8b94c63959d8ee0c92f42fac@mudrunka.cz> +1 :-) On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:21:43 +0100, Pascal Bach wrote: > Hi Alan, > > I already have a git repository up on github. > (https://github.com/pascal-bach/Unison) > I mainly use it to create ubuntu packages for my PPA. I occasionally > sync it with the main SVN repository. > > But I would also be in favor of git as revision control especially in > combination with Github. > > So +1 from my side for your idea. > > Pascal > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Alan Schmitt > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm about to create a git mirror of the Unison SVN repository, and I >> would like to have the developers opinion about using git instead of >> subversion. I've talked with Benjamin about this, and the idea is to >> initially keep SVN as the main repository to make sure everything is >> working fine, using git-svn to keep things in sync. >> >> Please let me know if you're strongly for or against this, and if >> you have any suggestion about it. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alan >> _______________________________________________ >> Unison-hackers mailing list >> Unison-hackers at lists.seas.upenn.edu >> http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers > _______________________________________________ > Unison-hackers mailing list > Unison-hackers at lists.seas.upenn.edu > http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers From schmitta at seas.upenn.edu Sat Mar 10 11:12:51 2012 From: schmitta at seas.upenn.edu (schmitta at seas.upenn.edu) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Unison-hackers] [unison-svn] r485 - trunk Message-ID: <201203101612.q2AGCqLB011761@yaws.seas.upenn.edu> Author: schmitta Date: 2012-03-10 11:12:51 -0500 (Sat, 10 Mar 2012) New Revision: 485 Added: trunk/unison_authors.txt Log: adding unison authors for svn to git mirroring Added: trunk/unison_authors.txt =================================================================== --- trunk/unison_authors.txt (rev 0) +++ trunk/unison_authors.txt 2012-03-10 16:12:51 UTC (rev 485) @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +bcpierce = Benjamin C. Pierce +ben = Ben Willmore +craigf = Craig Federighi +gildor = Sylvain Le Gall +lescuyer = St?phane Lescuyer +schmitta = Alan Schmitt +tjim = Trevor Jim +trevor = Trevor Jim +vouillon = J?r?me Vouillon From alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org Wed Mar 21 12:51:48 2012 From: alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org (Alan Schmitt) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:51:48 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository In-Reply-To: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> References: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> Message-ID: <96314379-6E6F-4AC6-9BAD-CC717E3843D4@polytechnique.org> On 4 mars 2012, at 16:03, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Hello, > > I'm about to create a git mirror of the Unison SVN repository, and I would like to have the developers opinion about using git instead of subversion. I've talked with Benjamin about this, and the idea is to initially keep SVN as the main repository to make sure everything is working fine, using git-svn to keep things in sync. This has been done. Documentation on how to use the git mirror is here: http://unison-mirror.forge.ocamlcore.org/ Any suggestion for improvement or clarification is more than welcomed. Alan From sylvain at le-gall.net Wed Mar 21 13:32:45 2012 From: sylvain at le-gall.net (Sylvain Le Gall) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository References: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> <96314379-6E6F-4AC6-9BAD-CC717E3843D4@polytechnique.org> Message-ID: On 21-03-2012, Alan Schmitt wrote: > On 4 mars 2012, at 16:03, Alan Schmitt wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm about to create a git mirror of the Unison SVN repository, and I would like to have the developers opinion about using git instead of subversion. I've talked with Benjamin about this, and the idea is to initially keep SVN as the main repository to make sure everything is working fine, using git-svn to keep things in sync. > > This has been done. Documentation on how to use the git mirror is here: > http://unison-mirror.forge.ocamlcore.org/ > > Any suggestion for improvement or clarification is more than welcomed. > Browse git directory: http://forge.ocamlcore.org/scm/browser.php?group_id=292 Alan, I think you should hide tabs about trackers/lists/docs/surveys/news/files if you don't intend to use it in the forge project. Let me know if you want me to do that, it'll take me 1s to do. Cheers, Sylvain Le Gall -- My company: http://www.ocamlcore.com Linkedin: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/sylvainlegall Start an OCaml project here: http://forge.ocamlcore.org OCaml blogs: http://planet.ocamlcore.org From alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org Thu Mar 22 03:28:25 2012 From: alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org (Alan Schmitt) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:28:25 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository In-Reply-To: References: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> <96314379-6E6F-4AC6-9BAD-CC717E3843D4@polytechnique.org> Message-ID: <9EF438AB-8F96-4E51-8F67-A01543165343@polytechnique.org> On 21 mars 2012, at 18:32, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > Alan, I think you should hide tabs about > trackers/lists/docs/surveys/news/files if you don't intend to use it in > the forge project. Let me know if you want me to do that, it'll take me > 1s to do. Thanks for the suggestion, I disabled everything except source code and statistics. Alan From trevor at research.att.com Fri Mar 23 11:21:24 2012 From: trevor at research.att.com (Trevor Jim) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository In-Reply-To: <96314379-6E6F-4AC6-9BAD-CC717E3843D4@polytechnique.org> References: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> <96314379-6E6F-4AC6-9BAD-CC717E3843D4@polytechnique.org>User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+67~g0e38650 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Message-ID: <87ty1fny17.fsf@research.att.com> I get an ssl error, is it just me? $ git clone -o mirror https://forge.ocamlcore.org/anonscm/git/unison-mirror/unison-mirror.git unison Cloning into 'unison'... error: SSL certificate problem, verify that the CA cert is OK. Details: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed while accessing https://forge.ocamlcore.org/anonscm/git/unison-mirror/unison-mirror.git/info/refs fatal: HTTP request failed -Trevor From alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org Fri Mar 23 11:36:44 2012 From: alan.schmitt at polytechnique.org (Alan Schmitt) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:36:44 +0100 Subject: [Unison-hackers] Using git for the Unison repository In-Reply-To: <87ty1fny17.fsf@research.att.com> References: <7AF76F82-419D-4696-B083-21CD432E7493@polytechnique.org> <96314379-6E6F-4AC6-9BAD-CC717E3843D4@polytechnique.org>User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+67~g0e38650 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) <87ty1fny17.fsf@research.att.com> Message-ID: <99C9B551-3FF2-4C60-B4B0-4B71A35E43E7@polytechnique.org> On 23 mars 2012, at 16:21, Trevor Jim wrote: > I get an ssl error, is it just me? > > $ git clone -o mirror https://forge.ocamlcore.org/anonscm/git/unison-mirror/unison-mirror.git unison > Cloning into 'unison'... > error: SSL certificate problem, verify that the CA cert is OK. Details: > error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed while accessing https://forge.ocamlcore.org/anonscm/git/unison-mirror/unison-mirror.git/info/refs > fatal: HTTP request failed I just tried it and it worked (with the exact same command line). Alan