[Unison-hackers] The results of your email commands

Matt McClure matt at matthewlmcclure.com
Mon Jun 15 15:00:16 EDT 2015


Thank you! The Homebrew maintainers requested the SHA256 instead. Mind
computing that also to confirm what I see myself?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Benjamin C. Pierce <bcpierce at cis.upenn.edu>
wrote:

> Confirmed.  And here’s the answer to your query.  :-)
>
> ~/pub/unison/download/releases/stable> openssl sha1 unison-2.48.3.tar.gz
> SHA1(unison-2.48.3.tar.gz)= 2a0cfc95e95b9e9457c39faa4fe5b8184023cd0c
>
>
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Matt McClure <matt at matthewlmcclure.com>
> wrote:
>
> Please confirm my subscription. I'd like to post the following question to
> the list:
>
> What is the expected SHA1 hash of the file at
> http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison//download/releases/stable/unison-2.48.3.tar.gz
>  ?
>
> The Homebrew community would like to confirm so that it can update its
> packaging configuration.
>
> Refer to https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/issues/35795
>
> --
> http://matthewlmcclure.com/
> http://cens.io/
>
>

-- 
http://matthewlmcclure.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/pipermail/unison-hackers/attachments/20150615/26051378/attachment.html>


More information about the Unison-hackers mailing list