[Unison-hackers] New beta release coming -- 2.50 or 2.51

[Steve Kalkwarf]

Version numbers are free, so I always make sure they increase.

If 2.51 doesn't feel like a nice, round major version, call it 2.60.

> On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Benjamin C. Pierce <bcpierce at cis.upenn.edu> wrote:
> 
> Dear unison hackers,
> 
> We’re getting ready to publish a new beta release of Unison, and we have a question about what major version number to give it.
> 
> The version number got bumped to 2.51 for a while in the master branch of the git repo, but later I realized that there was no need for this, since the set of preferences hasn’t changed.  Yesterday, I changed it back to 2.50, but this apparently confused at least one person who had already installed 2.51.  
> 
> If a lot of people have already installed 2.51 then we should just put it back to 2.51.  This is what I will do (later today) by default, since I have no way of knowing how many people this is.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
>  - B
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unison-hackers mailing list
> Unison-hackers at LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU
> https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3862 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/pipermail/unison-hackers/attachments/20180123/ed6e59cf/attachment.p7s>