[TYPES] stricter moderation...?
matthias at ccs.neu.edu
Thu Dec 22 08:50:51 EST 2005
On Dec 21, 2005, at 12:10 PM, David J. Pym wrote:
> [The Types Forum,
> I would suggest very little moderation (otherwise known as censorship)
An accusation of "censorship" for Eijiro Sumii's proposal is completely
out of place. Moderation is hard labor that provides a valuable
service: it accelerates my information processing. Furthermore, an
abuse of the word "censorship" like that makes it a useless accusation
when it is needed. This kind of abuse can only be committed by people
who have never experienced real censorship.
Having said that, I find Stephanie's policy of "you can post if you
subscribe" just fine.
More information about the Types-list