[TYPES] Why are ACM conference registrations so expensive now?

[Hugo Herbelin]

And not talking about the CO2e cost of conferences which (ineluctably)
will have to be more and more taken into account as well...

For instance, in France, the government started to ask research
institutions to develop a trajectory of reduction of the carbon
footprint, targetting the European objective of at least -55%
reduction of the emissions in 2030 compared to 1990.

Best,

Hugo

[1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://services.dgesip.fr/fichiers/Plan_climat_MESR_4.pdf__;!!IBzWLUs!RB6IfyRJalr1rpr5D2cvemN8wzF5KZ3JG2AVAtGDoOcm8teLyRCtSt_1gVB9GFbDsKGonXjy74wgx8sHAuc6QavKEcu0twVljH4x$ 

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 01:27:32PM -0500, Jules Jacobs wrote:
> [ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ]
> 
> It may be worth keeping in mind that how nice a location is depends on how
> we model an attendee's budget. If we think of the budget as being elastic,
> then the nicest location is likely to be the most expensive. If, on the
> other hand, we model the budget as fixed, then the most expensive location
> is probably not the nicest location for those with a smaller budget. If
> one's budget is not much larger than the conference fee plus travel
> expenses, then it may be necessary to stay in a shared-room hostel far away
> from the conference hotel, or forgo dinner with colleagues, limiting
> networking opportunities. Thus, when comparing locations, it may be worth
> evaluating niceness as a function of budget, in addition to inherent
> niceness of the location.
> 
> Best,
> Jules
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jonathan Aldrich <
> jonathan.aldrich at cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
> 
> > [ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list
> > ]
> >
> > It's worth comparing numbers over time, and adjusting for inflation.  I
> > haven't done this for POPL, but I did do it recently for SPLASH (which is
> > arguably comparable in size and complexity).  Here are the numbers on a
> > spreadsheet:
> >
> >
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VF2APYEXb3f_jKhItq9aXq-tQR0OMLKJma-f0pLlQns/edit?usp=sharing__;!!IBzWLUs!RLSUFNj7d12QNEaAsaf7QNHF10wUs_aTeC6_42ukF1EncYFHq7xpu_9PwgU_FMkUrp0xV5yzVkveZpOACi9MAZ26-hdZ_iQWNLr8K1ShFg$
> >
> > Short summary: the average 6-day SPLASH registration price (ACM members,
> > early) was approximately constant from 2015 to 2019, at about $1410 in 2023
> > dollars.  2020 was virtual so is not included in the spreadsheet.  2021 was
> > very low; Hridesh as GC got amazing deals because everyone was coming back
> > from Covid.  2022 was also low--it illustrates what is possible if you hold
> > conferences in universities (SPLASH was at the University of Auckland).
> > But, few universities have enough space to host conferences the size of
> > SPLASH and POPL, and few are available at the right time (the University of
> > Auckland worked because it was summer break in the Southern Hemisphere).
> > SPLASH 2023 was higher than the average, at $1690.
> >
> > Note that inflation plays a significant role in perceptions of price
> > increases.  The nominal cost of SPLASH 2015 was $1125.  So if you look at
> > the unadjusted dollar cost difference between 2015 and 2023, more than half
> > of it is attributable to inflation.  I don't have any data on whether
> > inflation has affected conference costs (such as hotels and food) more or
> > less than other costs, but we should recognize this is a possibility.
> >
> > For POPL 2024, I calculate a 6-day price of £744+456+228=£1428, or about
> > $1785 USD.  So it is definitely higher than the SPLASH historical average,
> > but not enormously higher, and pretty close to the recent SPLASH in Lisbon.
> >
> > As Philippa says, the community has to decide whether it wants to pay the
> > cost of attractive locations, etc.; London is undeniably nice (I very much
> > wish I could come, but it's the first week of our semester and I can't make
> > it this year).  I would personally like to see costs a bit closer to the
> > historical average but I agree that making that happen can be quite
> > challenging, depending on location.  I always do appreciate organizers
> > working to keep costs as low as possible, as Philppa has!
> >
> > I hope the context is helpful.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 8:59 AM Neel Krishnaswami <nk480 at cl.cam.ac.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > [ The Types Forum,
> > http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list
> > > ]
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just registered for POPL, and the total cost was over 2000 USD. This
> > > seems really high, and it seems something that has gotten a lot worse
> > > over the last year or two. For example, ICFP a few months ago was 1500
> > > USD, and POPL last year was 1375 USD.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know what factors have been driving up the cost of our
> > > conferences up so quickly? I'm worried we're making our events
> > > inaccessible to anyone but the best-funded researchers and institutions.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Neel
> > >
> > >
> >